Tesla K40t vs Radeon HD 8670D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1107not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameDevastatorGK110B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 March 2013 (13 years ago)22 November 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842880
Core clock speed844 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz876 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate22.80210.2
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS5.046 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs24240
L1 Cacheno data240 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2013 22 November 2013
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 245 Watt

HD 8670D has 145% lower power consumption.

Tesla K40t, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 14% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8670D and Tesla K40t. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8670D is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K40t is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 78 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla K40t on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8670D or Tesla K40t, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.