GeForce4 410 Go vs Radeon HD 8670D
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1107 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.94 | no data |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) | Celsius (1999−2005) |
| GPU code name | Devastator | NV17 A3 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 March 2013 (13 years ago) | 6 February 2002 (24 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 844 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | 29 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 22.80 | 0.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7296 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | 2 |
| TMUs | 24 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | AGP 4x |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 16 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 3.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 8.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 March 2013 | 6 February 2002 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 150 nm |
HD 8670D has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 369% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8670D and GeForce4 410 Go. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 8670D is a desktop graphics card while GeForce4 410 Go is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
