NVS 810 vs Radeon HD 8650M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8650M with NVS 810, including specs and performance data.

HD 8650M
2013
2 GB GDDR5
1.88

NVS 810 outperforms HD 8650M by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking968861
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.13
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameno dataGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2013 (13 years ago)4 November 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512 ×2
Core clock speed650 MHz902 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1033 MHz
Number of transistors900 Million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data68 Watt
Texture fill rateno data33.06 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data1.058 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data16 ×2
TMUsno data32 ×2
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed4500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s ×2
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data8x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Palworld 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Fortnite 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Palworld 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Valorant 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−41%
55−60
+41%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Fortnite 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Palworld 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Valorant 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Valorant 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Palworld 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Valorant 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Valorant 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.88 2.75
Recency 7 January 2013 4 November 2015

NVS 810 has a 46% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The NVS 810 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8650M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650M is a notebook graphics card while NVS 810 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate NVS 810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650M or NVS 810, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.