GeForce 8400 GS vs Radeon HD 8650M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 8650M with GeForce 8400 GS, including specs and performance data.

HD 8650M
2013
2 GB GDDR5
1.88
+359%

HD 8650M outperforms 8400 GS by a whopping 359% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9671341
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.79
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameno dataG86
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2013 (13 years ago)17 April 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$29.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed650 MHz459 MHz
Number of transistors900 Million210 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.672
Floating-point processing powerno data0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Standard memory config per GPUno data256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed4500 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Palworld 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Fortnite 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Palworld 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Valorant 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+388%
8−9
−388%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Fortnite 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
Palworld 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Valorant 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Valorant 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Palworld 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Valorant 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Palworld 2−3 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Valorant 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.88 0.41
Recency 7 January 2013 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm

HD 8650M has a 359% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 8650M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 686 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650M or GeForce 8400 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.