FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 8650D IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.44
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameScrapperRV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 December 2013 (12 years ago)16 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384800
Core clock speed720 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed844 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate20.2625.00
Floating-point processing power0.6482 TFLOPS1 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2440
L1 Cache64 KB160 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared993 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data63.55 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 December 2013 16 June 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

HD 8650D IGP has an age advantage of 5 years, a 72% more advanced lithography process, and 131% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8650D IGP and FireStream 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8650D IGP is a desktop graphics card while FireStream 9250 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 9 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8650D IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8650D IGP or FireStream 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.