ATI FireGL X3-256 vs Radeon HD 8610G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1191not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameRichlandR420
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 May 2013 (13 years ago)3 August 2004 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed533 MHz491 MHz
Boost clock speed626 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data160 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data57 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.892
ROPsno data12
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data454 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data29.06 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX119.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 3 August 2004
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm

HD 8610G has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 306% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8610G and FireGL X3-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8610G is a notebook graphics card while FireGL X3-256 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 31 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8610G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8610G or FireGL X3-256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.