Tesla K20X vs Radeon HD 8550G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1174not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.19no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteGK110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 May 2013 (13 years ago)12 November 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562688
Core clock speed515 MHz732 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt235 Watt
Texture fill rate11.52164.0
Floating-point processing power0.3686 TFLOPS3.935 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs16224
L1 Cacheno data224 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data249.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 12 November 2012
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 235 Watt

HD 8550G has an age advantage of 6 months, and 571% lower power consumption.

Tesla K20X, on the other hand, has a 14% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8550G and Tesla K20X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8550G is a notebook graphics card while Tesla K20X is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 104 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8550G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 54 votes

Rate Tesla K20X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8550G or Tesla K20X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.