T500 Max-Q vs Radeon HD 8510G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1201not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.99no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameDevastatorTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date23 May 2013 (13 years ago)2 December 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed554 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate17.2879.80
Floating-point processing power0.553 TFLOPS2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2456
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 2 December 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

T500 Max-Q has an age advantage of 7 years, a 167% more advanced lithography process, and 94% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8510G and T500 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8510G is a notebook graphics card while T500 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 29 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8510G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 20 votes

Rate T500 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8510G or T500 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.