Tesla S2050 vs Radeon HD 8470D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1206not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.04no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameScrapperGF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 July 2013 (13 years ago)25 July 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192448 ×4
Core clock speed800 MHz574 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt900 Watt
Texture fill rate10.2032.14 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs448 ×4
TMUs1256 ×4
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared3 GB ×4
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedSystem Shared773 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data148.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2013 25 July 2011
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 900 Watt

HD 8470D has an age advantage of 2 years, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1285% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8470D and Tesla S2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8470D is a desktop graphics card while Tesla S2050 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 130 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8470D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 58 votes

Rate Tesla S2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8470D or Tesla S2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.