GMA 950 vs Radeon HD 8470D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1205not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.04no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 3.5 (2005)
GPU code nameScrapperLakeport
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 July 2013 (13 years ago)1 May 2005 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed800 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate10.200.66
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2013 1 May 2005
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 7 Watt

HD 8470D has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 181% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 950, on the other hand, has 829% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8470D and GMA 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8470D is a desktop graphics card while GMA 950 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 126 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8470D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 193 votes

Rate GMA 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8470D or GMA 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.