ATI FireMV 2200 vs Radeon HD 8450G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1216not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.77no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameScrapperRV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 May 2013 (13 years ago)2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed533 MHz324 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate8.6401.296
Floating-point processing power0.2765 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared392 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data3.136 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

HD 8450G has a 244% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2200, on the other hand, has 133% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8450G and FireMV 2200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8450G is a notebook graphics card while FireMV 2200 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 18 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8450G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 6 votes

Rate FireMV 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8450G or FireMV 2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.