ATI Radeon X1800 XL vs HD 8350G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1266not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.41no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteR520
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 March 2013 (13 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed514 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate5.7608.000
Floating-point processing power0.1843 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 March 2013 1 October 2005
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 70 Watt

HD 8350G has an age advantage of 7 years, a 181% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8350G and Radeon X1800 XL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8350G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1800 XL is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 16 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon X1800 XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8350G or Radeon X1800 XL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.