FirePro S9300 X2 vs Radeon HD 8330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1255not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.46no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameKalindiCapsaicin
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 August 2013 (13 years ago)31 March 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1284096 ×2
Core clock speed497 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate3.976217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs464 ×2
TMUs8256 ×2
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2013 31 March 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

HD 8330 has 1900% lower power consumption.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8330 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8330 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 217 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8330 or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.