Quadro P520 vs Radeon HD 8310G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated695
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.85
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameScrapper LiteGP108
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release dateJuly 2013 (13 years ago)23 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128384
Core clock speed554 MHz1303 MHz
Boost clock speed720 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate5.76035.83
Floating-point processing power0.1843 TFLOPS1.147 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs824
L1 Cacheno data144 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48.06 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 18 Watt

Quadro P520 has a 129% more advanced lithography process, and 11% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8310G and Quadro P520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8310G is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P520 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8310G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 115 votes

Rate Quadro P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8310G or Quadro P520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.