P102-100 vs Radeon HD 8280

Place in the ranking	1272	527
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	1.06
Power efficiency	3.20	2.84
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Kalindi	GP102
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	18 September 2013 (12 years ago)	12 February 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	3200
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1582 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1683 MHz
Number of transistors	1,178 million	11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.600	336.6
Floating-point processing power	0.1152 TFLOPS	10.77 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	80
TMUs	8	200
L1 Cache	no data	1.2 MB
L2 Cache	no data	2.5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x4
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	IGP	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	5 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1376 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	440.3 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 8280 0.62

P102-100 9.18
+1381%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 8280 260
Samples: 103

P102-100 3826
+1372%

Samples: 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Palworld	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1300%	70−75 +1300%
Palworld	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1275%	110−120 +1275%
Valorant	27−30 −1329%	400−450 +1329%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	18−20 −1374%	280−290 +1374%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Dota 2	12−14 −1317%	170−180 +1317%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1300%	70−75 +1300%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
Palworld	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1275%	110−120 +1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −1317%	85−90 +1317%
Valorant	27−30 −1329%	400−450 +1329%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Dota 2	12−14 −1317%	170−180 +1317%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1300%	70−75 +1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −1275%	110−120 +1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −1317%	85−90 +1317%
Valorant	27−30 −1329%	400−450 +1329%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld

3−4

−1233%

40−45
+1233%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	3−4 −1233%	40−45 +1233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −1329%	100−105 +1329%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	0−1	0−1
Palworld	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1367%	220−230 +1367%
Valorant	6−7 −1317%	85−90 +1317%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−1250%

27−30
+1250%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

2−3

−1250%

27−30
+1250%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.62	9.18
Recency	18 September 2013	12 February 2018
Chip lithography	28 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	250 Watt

HD 8280 has 1567% lower power consumption.

P102-100, on the other hand, has a 1381% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The P102-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8280 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8280 is a desktop graphics card while P102-100 is a workstation one.