FirePro S7150 x2 vs Radeon HD 8250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1300not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.03no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameKalindiTonga
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 May 2013 (13 years ago)1 February 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281792 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz920 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,178 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt265 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200103.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1024 TFLOPS3.297 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs8112 ×2
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 1 February 2016
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 265 Watt

HD 8250 has 3213% lower power consumption.

S7150 x2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8250 and FirePro S7150 x2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8250 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S7150 x2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 18 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 10 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 x2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8250 or FirePro S7150 x2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.