Quadro 4100 vs Radeon HD 8240

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1281not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.04no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameKalindiGK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 November 2013 (12 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281344
Core clock speed400 MHz797 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20089.26
Floating-point processing power0.1024 TFLOPSno data
ROPs432
TMUs8112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
WidthIGP1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1782 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data57.02 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.36.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

HD 8240 has 133% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 8240 and Quadro 4100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 8240 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 4100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 43 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 8240 or Quadro 4100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.