GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon HD 7990

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7990 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7990
2013, $999
3 GB GDDR5, 375 Watt
13.36
RTX 3060 Ti
2020, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 200 Watt
48.52
+263%

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms HD 7990 by a whopping 263% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking42775
Place by popularitynot in top-10023
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.3552.60
Power efficiency2.7618.81
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMaltaGA104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 April 2013 (13 years ago)1 December 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 3060 Ti has 3796% better value for money than HD 7990.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048 ×24864
Core clock speed950 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate128.0 ×2253.1
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS ×216.2 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×280
TMUs128 ×2152
Tensor Coresno data152
Ray Tracing Coresno data38
L1 Cache512 KB4.8 MB
L2 Cache768 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length307 mm242 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB ×28 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s ×2448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7990 13.36
RTX 3060 Ti 48.52
+263%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7990 5565
Samples: 301
RTX 3060 Ti 20215
+263%
Samples: 34773

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7990 15540
RTX 3060 Ti 29122
+87.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−74.1%
135
1440p18−2174
+311%
4K12−1448
+300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p28.542.96
+89.6%
1440p55.505.39
+90.3%
4K83.258.31
+90%
  • RTX 3060 Ti has 90% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Ti has 90% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Ti has 90% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 236 236
Counter-Strike 2 344 344
Cyberpunk 2077 132 132
Resident Evil 4 Remake 172 172

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 180 180
Battlefield 5 145 145
Counter-Strike 2 330 330
Cyberpunk 2077 113 113
Far Cry 5 144 144
Fortnite 210−220 210−220
Forza Horizon 4 200 200
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 280−290 280−290

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 103 103
Battlefield 5 124 124
Counter-Strike 2 224 224
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 95 95
Dota 2 145 145
Far Cry 5 137 137
Fortnite 210−220 210−220
Forza Horizon 4 196 196
Grand Theft Auto V 141 141
Metro Exodus 110 110
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 185 185
Valorant 280−290 280−290

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 114 114
Cyberpunk 2077 84 84
Dota 2 135 135
Far Cry 5 129 129
Forza Horizon 4 173 173
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92 92
Valorant 274 274

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220 210−220

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 146 146
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400 350−400
Grand Theft Auto V 97 97
Metro Exodus 66 66
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 98 98
Cyberpunk 2077 54 54
Far Cry 5 105 105
Forza Horizon 4 150 150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110 100−110

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140 130−140

4K
High

Atomic Heart 40−45 40−45
Counter-Strike 2 36 36
Grand Theft Auto V 107 107
Metro Exodus 43 43
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77 77
Valorant 290−300 290−300

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65 65
Counter-Strike 2 60−65 60−65
Cyberpunk 2077 25 25
Dota 2 109 109
Far Cry 5 65 65
Forza Horizon 4 103 103
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 75−80

4K
Epic

Fortnite 70−75 70−75

This is how HD 7990 and RTX 3060 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Ti is 286% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 311% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 Ti is 300% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.36 48.52
Recency 24 April 2013 1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 200 Watt

RTX 3060 Ti has a 263% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 71% more advanced lithography process, and 47% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7990 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 61 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7990 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19669 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7990 or GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.