Arc B390 vs Radeon HD 7990

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7990 with Arc B390, including specs and performance data.

HD 7990
2013, $999
3 GB GDDR5, 375 Watt
13.36

B390 outperforms HD 7990 by an impressive 61% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking425301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.35no data
Power efficiency2.7620.83
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameMaltaPanther Lake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 April 2013 (13 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048 ×21536
Core clock speed950 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate128.0 ×2120.0
Floating-point processing power4.096 TFLOPS ×27.68 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×224
TMUs128 ×248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cache512 KB768 KB
L2 Cache768 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length307 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7990 13.36
Arc B390 21.53
+61.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7990 5565
Samples: 301
Arc B390 8968
+61.2%
Samples: 516

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD 7990 15540
Arc B390 17018
+9.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−62.9%
57
+62.9%
1440p21−24
−71.4%
36
+71.4%
4K14−16
−71.4%
24
+71.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p28.54no data
1440p47.57no data
4K71.36no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 87
+0%
87
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 149
+0%
149
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+0%
46
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 96
+0%
96
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18
+0%
18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how HD 7990 and Arc B390 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B390 is 63% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B390 is 71% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B390 is 71% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.36 21.53
Recency 24 April 2013 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 80 Watt

Arc B390 has a 61% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 833% more advanced lithography process, and 369% lower power consumption.

The Arc B390 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7990 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7990 is a desktop graphics card while Arc B390 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 61 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7990 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 27 votes

Rate Arc B390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7990 or Arc B390, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.