ATI Radeon X800 GT AGP vs HD 7620G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1208not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.60no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameDevastatorR481
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2012 (14 years ago)1 November 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed360 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed497 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,303 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate11.935.700
Floating-point processing power0.3817 TFLOPSno data
ROPs812
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared493 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data31.55 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 1 November 2005
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 40 Watt

HD 7620G has an age advantage of 6 years, a 306% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7620G and Radeon X800 GT AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7620G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 GT AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7620G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 GT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7620G or Radeon X800 GT AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.