Tesla P10 vs Radeon HD 7560G IGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteGP102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2012 (14 years ago)13 September 2016 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2563840
Core clock speed496 MHz1025 MHz
Boost clock speed760 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate12.16358.3
Floating-point processing power0.3891 TFLOPS11.47 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16240
L1 Cacheno data1.4 MB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1808 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data694.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2012 13 September 2016
Chip lithography 32 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 150 Watt

HD 7560G IGP has 329% lower power consumption.

Tesla P10, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7560G IGP and Tesla P10. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7560G IGP is a notebook graphics card while Tesla P10 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560G IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Tesla P10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7560G IGP or Tesla P10, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.