GMA 3000 vs Radeon HD 7560D

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1148not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency1.29no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameDevastator LiteBroadwater
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 October 2012 (13 years ago)1 June 2006 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed760 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate12.161.600
Floating-point processing power0.3891 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2012 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 13 Watt

HD 7560D has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 181% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3000, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7560D and GMA 3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7560D is a desktop graphics card while GMA 3000 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 161 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 47 votes

Rate GMA 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7560D or GMA 3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.