GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost vs Radeon HD 7480D
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1252 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.80 | no data |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) | no data |
| GPU code name | Scrapper Lite | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 October 2012 (13 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $53 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 6.400 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.2048 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | no data |
| TMUs | 8 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | no data |
| Width | IGP | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | no data |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | no data |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 10 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 October 2012 | 3 June 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
HD 7480D has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 103% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 7480D and GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 7480D is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
