RTX A500 vs Radeon HD 7290

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7290 with RTX A500, including specs and performance data.

HD 7290
2012
18 Watt
0.27

RTX A500 outperforms HD 7290 by a whopping 5719% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1432381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1620.26
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameLovelandGA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 June 2012 (14 years ago)10 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores802048
Core clock speed400 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors450 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200113.3
Floating-point processing power0.064 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7290 0.27
RTX A500 15.71
+5719%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7290 111
Samples: 122
RTX A500 6544
+5795%
Samples: 935

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Palworld 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%
Palworld 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−5614%
400−450
+5614%
Valorant 24−27
−5700%
1450−1500
+5700%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−5669%
750−800
+5669%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
−5456%
500−550
+5456%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%
Palworld 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−5614%
400−450
+5614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5700%
290−300
+5700%
Valorant 24−27
−5700%
1450−1500
+5700%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
−5456%
500−550
+5456%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−5614%
400−450
+5614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5700%
290−300
+5700%
Valorant 24−27
−5700%
1450−1500
+5700%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

1440p
Epic

Palworld 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−5567%
850−900
+5567%
Valorant 5−6
−5700%
290−300
+5700%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 15.71
Recency 6 June 2012 10 November 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 60 Watt

HD 7290 has 233% lower power consumption.

RTX A500, on the other hand, has a 5719% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7290 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7290 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 170 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7290 or RTX A500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.