GeForce 6800 XT vs Radeon HD 7290

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7290 with GeForce 6800 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD 7290
2012
18 Watt
0.27

6800 XT outperforms HD 7290 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14321416
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.16no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameLovelandNV42
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 June 2012 (14 years ago)30 September 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed400 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistors450 million202 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.2005.400
Floating-point processing power0.064 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data38.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 7290 0.27
6800 XT 0.29
+7.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7290 111
Samples: 122
6800 XT 120
+8.1%
Samples: 34

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic

Palworld 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 0.29
Recency 6 June 2012 30 September 2005
Chip lithography 40 nm 110 nm

HD 7290 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 7% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 7290 and GeForce 6800 XT.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7290 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 6800 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 61 votes

Rate GeForce 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 7290 or GeForce 6800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.