GeForce 9600 GTX vs Radeon HD 6970

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking613not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.94no data
Power efficiency2.10no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameCaymanG92
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date14 December 2010 (15 years ago)27 May 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153696
Core clock speedno data580 MHz
Boost clock speed880 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,640 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)550 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate84.4827.84
Floating-point processing power2.703 TFLOPS0.2784 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs9648
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length286 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data44.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.22x DVI, 1x S-Video
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1111.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2010 27 May 2009
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 550 Watt 140 Watt

HD 6970 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

9600 GTX, on the other hand, has 293% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6970 and GeForce 9600 GTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 174 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 21 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6970 or GeForce 9600 GTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.