Moore Threads MTT S3000 vs Radeon HD 6950

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking637not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.97no data
Power efficiency2.41no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)MUSA
GPU code nameCaymanChunxiao
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date14 December 2010 (15 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14084096
Core clock speedno data1900 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,640 million22,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate70.40486.4
Floating-point processing power2.253 TFLOPS15.56 TFLOPS
ROPs32256
TMUs88256
L1 Cache352 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm269 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan-1.4

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 250 Watt

Moore Threads MTT S3000 has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6950 and Moore Threads MTT S3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6950 is a desktop graphics card while Moore Threads MTT S3000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 244 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Moore Threads MTT S3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6950 or Moore Threads MTT S3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.