GeForce 310 OEM vs Radeon HD 6930

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking617not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.87no data
Power efficiency2.78no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 3 (2010−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCaymanGT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 December 2011 (14 years ago)27 November 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$180 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128016
Core clock speed750 MHz589 MHz
Number of transistors2,640 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)186 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate60.004.712
Floating-point processing power1.92 TFLOPS0.04486 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs808
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length220 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s5.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 27 November 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 186 Watt 31 Watt

HD 6930 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

310 OEM, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6930 and GeForce 310 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 67 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate GeForce 310 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6930 or GeForce 310 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.