Quadro 4000M vs Radeon HD 6770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6750 6770 6770 Green Edition 5670 640SP Edition 5750 5770 5770 Mac Edition 5770 X2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000M 2000M 3000M 3000M X2 4000M 5000M 5010M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6770 with Quadro 4000M, including specs and performance data.

HD 6770
2011, $129
1 GB GDDR5, 108 Watt
3.06
Quadro 4000M
2011, $449
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
3.11
+1.6%

4000M outperforms HD 6770 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD 6770 HD 6770
Quadro 4000M Quadro 4000M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking827821
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.550.16
Power efficiency2.192.41
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameJuniperGF104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date21 January 2011 (15 years ago)22 February 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

HD 6770 has 244% better value for money than Quadro 4000M.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800336
Core clock speedno data475 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,040 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate34.0026.60
Floating-point processing power1.36 TFLOPS0.6384 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4056
L1 Cache80 KB448 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 2.0 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length198 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz625 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD 6770 3.06
Quadro 4000M 3.11
+1.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6770 1273
Samples: 2762
Quadro 4000M 1295
+1.7%
Samples: 210

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
−9.2%
71
+9.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.98
+219%
6.32
−219%
  • HD 6770 has 219% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how HD 6770 and Quadro 4000M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro 4000M is 9% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.06 3.11
Recency 21 January 2011 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 100 Watt

Quadro 4000M has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon HD 6770 and Quadro 4000M.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6770 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 4000M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
vs
GTX 280 GeForce GTX 280
Quadro 4000M Quadro 4000M
vs
FirePro M5950 FirePro M5950
HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
vs
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
HD 6750 HD 6750
vs
Pro Vega 48 Pro Vega 48
HD 6750 HD 6750
vs
Pro 5700 XT Pro 5700 XT
HD 6750 HD 6750
vs
Playstation 4 Slim GPU Playstation 4 Slim GPU
HD 6750 HD 6750
vs
RTX 5080 RTX 5080
HD 6750 HD 6750
vs
RTX 5070 Ti RTX 5070 Ti
HD 6770 HD 6770
vs
K1100M K1100M
HD 6770 HD 6770
vs
GT 730M GT 730M
HD 6770 HD 6770
vs
FirePro W2100 W2100
HD 6770 HD 6770
vs
HD 7670A HD 7670A
HD 6770 HD 6770
vs
ATI HD 3870 HD 3870

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 410 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 37 votes

Rate Quadro 4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6770 or Quadro 4000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.