T600 Max-Q vs Radeon HD 6650A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking946not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.44no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameOnegaTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date19 April 2011 (15 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480896
Core clock speed600 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1395 MHz
Number of transistors716 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate14.4078.12
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPS2.5 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2456
L1 Cache48 KB896 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2011 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 40 Watt

T600 Max-Q has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233% more advanced lithography process, and 13% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6650A and T600 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6650A is a notebook graphics card while T600 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6650A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate T600 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6650A or T600 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.