Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU vs Radeon HD 6650A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking945not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.44no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)no data
GPU code nameOnegano data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date19 April 2011 (15 years ago)30 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48016
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate14.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.576 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)no data
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 April 2011 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 3 nm

Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1233% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6650A and M4 Pro 16-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6650A is a notebook graphics card while Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6650A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 25 votes

Rate M4 Pro 16-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6650A or M4 Pro 16-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.