GMA 3150 vs Radeon HD 6570M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10661617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.51no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameCapilanoPineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date26 November 2010 (15 years ago)9 May 2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40016
Core clock speed650 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors627 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate13.000.8
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs81
TMUs202
L1 Cache40 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Palworld 5−6 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Fortnite 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Palworld 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Fortnite 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
Palworld 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 no data
Palworld 5−6 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
Valorant 6−7 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data
Palworld 2−3 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 8−9 no data

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 November 2010 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 40 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 13 Watt

HD 6570M has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 13% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 131% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6570M and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 181 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6570M or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.