GeForce 705A vs Radeon HD 6550A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1001not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.76no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code namePinewoodGF119
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 February 2011 (15 years ago)1 October 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48048
Core clock speed550 MHz738 MHz
Number of transistors627 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate13.205.904
Floating-point processing power0.528 TFLOPS0.1417 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs248
L1 Cache48 KB64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2011 1 October 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

HD 6550A has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce 705A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 133% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6550A and GeForce 705A. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6550A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 5 votes

Rate GeForce 705A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6550A or GeForce 705A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.