FirePro W4150M vs Radeon HD 6550A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1001not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.76no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code namePinewoodMars
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 February 2011 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480384
Core clock speed550 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data850 MHz
Number of transistors627 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.2020.40
Floating-point processing power0.528 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs2424
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

HD 6550A has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

W4150M, on the other hand, has a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6550A and FirePro W4150M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6550A is a notebook graphics card while FirePro W4150M is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6550A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6550A or FirePro W4150M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.