GeForce 9400 vs Radeon HD 6540G2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 6540G2 with GeForce 9400, including specs and performance data.

HD 6540G2
2011
1.18
+228%

HD 6540G2 outperforms 9400 by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11151356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.70
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameno dataC79
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 June 2011 (15 years ago)18 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48016
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data314 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Palworld 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Palworld 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Valorant 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Palworld 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Valorant 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Valorant 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Palworld 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Valorant 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Palworld 2−3 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Valorant 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 0.36
Recency 14 June 2011 18 June 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm

HD 6540G2 has a 228% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 6540G2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6540G2 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9400 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6540G2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 16 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6540G2 or GeForce 9400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.