ATI FireGL V7350 vs Radeon HD 6520G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1240not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.59no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameSumoR520
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2011 (14 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed400 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors1,178 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt111 Watt
Texture fill rate6.4009.600
Floating-point processing power0.256 TFLOPSno data
ROPs816
TMUs1616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared650 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data41.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2011 1 October 2005
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 111 Watt

HD 6520G has an age advantage of 6 years, a 181% more advanced lithography process, and 217% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6520G and FireGL V7350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6520G is a notebook graphics card while FireGL V7350 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 159 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6520G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FireGL V7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6520G or FireGL V7350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.