GeForce 256 SDR vs Radeon HD 6320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1366not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.50no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameLovelandNV10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2011 (14 years ago)11 October 1999 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$554.99 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed508 MHz120 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors450 million17 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm220 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.0640.48
Floating-point processing power0.08128 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared143 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.144 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2011 11 October 1999
Chip lithography 40 nm 220 nm

HD 6320 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6320 and GeForce 256 SDR. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6320 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 256 SDR is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 234 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 146 votes

Rate GeForce 256 SDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6320 or GeForce 256 SDR, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.