Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon HD 6290
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon HD 6290 with Iris Plus Graphics 645, including specs and performance data.
Plus Graphics 645 outperforms HD 6290 by a whopping 1548% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1442 | 742 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.02 | 21.25 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) | Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | Cedar | Coffee Lake GT3e |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 4 December 2011 (14 years ago) | 7 October 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 80 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 292 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 5.200 | 50.40 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.104 TFLOPS | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 6 |
| TMUs | 8 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | Ring Bus |
| Length | 168 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 6
−333%
| 26
+333%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| Palworld | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−567%
|
20−22
+567%
|
| Palworld | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−143%
|
16−18
+143%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−120%
|
55−60
+120%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−462%
|
70−75
+462%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−222%
|
29
+222%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−567%
|
20−22
+567%
|
| Palworld | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−143%
|
16−18
+143%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−120%
|
55−60
+120%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−200%
|
27
+200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−567%
|
20−22
+567%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−143%
|
16−18
+143%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−120%
|
55−60
+120%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Palworld | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−1000%
|
30−35
+1000%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
1440p
Epic
| Palworld | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−260%
|
18−20
+260%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how HD 6290 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 compete in popular games:
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 is 333% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics 645 is 1000% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Iris Plus Graphics 645 performs better in 25 tests (48%)
- there's a draw in 27 tests (52%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 4.12 |
| Recency | 4 December 2011 | 7 October 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 15 Watt |
Iris Plus Graphics 645 has a 1548% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 27% lower power consumption.
The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6290 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon HD 6290 is a desktop graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
