GeForce2 MX vs Radeon HD 6250

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14561615
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameCedarNV11 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date31 January 2011 (15 years ago)28 June 2000 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed650 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors292 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.2000.7
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI1x VGA
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 6250 94
+4600%
Samples: 300
GeForce2 MX 2
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Palworld 3−4 no data

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
Palworld 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
Palworld 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
Valorant 24−27 no data

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 3−4 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 no data

1440p
Epic

Palworld 0−1 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 5−6 no data

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2011 28 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

HD 6250 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6250 and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 92 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 29 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6250 or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.