FirePro S9300 X2 vs Radeon HD 6250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1456not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.94no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameCedarCapsaicin
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 January 2011 (15 years ago)31 March 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores804096 ×2
Core clock speed650 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors292 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate5.200217.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPS6.963 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs464 ×2
TMUs8256 ×2
L1 Cache16 KB1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed500 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s512.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.0
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 January 2011 31 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 300 Watt

HD 6250 has 1479% lower power consumption.

S9300 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 6250 and FirePro S9300 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 6250 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S9300 X2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 92 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 8 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 6250 or FirePro S9300 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.