ATI FireGL X2-256T vs ATI Radeon HD 5490

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameCedarR360
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 October 2012 (13 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80no data
Core clock speed650 MHz412 MHz
Number of transistors292 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.2003.296
Floating-point processing power0.104 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz344 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s22.02 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA2x DVI
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)9.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2012 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

ATI HD 5490 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 5490 and FireGL X2-256T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 5490 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL X2-256T is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 11 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5490 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL X2-256T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 5490 or FireGL X2-256T, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.