GeForce GT 650M vs ATI Radeon HD 4860

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated848
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data4.87
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV790GK107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 September 2009 (16 years ago)22 March 2012 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speed700 MHzUp to 900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors959 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate22.4030.40
Floating-point processing power0.896 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3232
L1 Cache128 KB32 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sUp to 80.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 API
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 September 2009 22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 45 Watt

GT 650M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96% more advanced lithography process, and 189% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4860 and GeForce GT 650M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4860 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 650M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 12 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4860 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 521 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4860 or GeForce GT 650M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.