Iris Plus Graphics vs ATI Radeon HD 4855

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated731
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.97
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRV770Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 January 2010 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
Core clock speed575 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors956 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate18.4032.00
Floating-point processing power0.736 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3232
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length220 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics has a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 633% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4855 and Iris Plus Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon HD 4855 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 496 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4855 or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.