Arc Graphics 32EU vs ATI Radeon HD 4850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking893not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.23no data
Power efficiency1.73no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Xe2-LPG (2024)
GPU code nameRV770Arrow Lake
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 June 2008 (18 years ago)24 October 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800256
Core clock speed625 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors956 million17,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate25.0031.20
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS0.9984 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4016
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Length246 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed993 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 June 2008 24 October 2024
Chip lithography 55 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 65 Watt

Arc Graphics 32EU has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1733% more advanced lithography process, and 69% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4850 and Arc Graphics 32EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 309 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 32EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4850 or Arc Graphics 32EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.