GeForce4 410 Go vs ATI Radeon HD 4770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking924not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.33no data
Power efficiency2.11no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameRV740NV17 A3
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 April 2009 (17 years ago)6 February 2002 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed750 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors826 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.000.8
Floating-point processing power0.96 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs324
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length203 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)8.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 April 2009 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

ATI HD 4770 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4770 and GeForce4 410 Go. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4770 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce4 410 Go is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 77 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 410 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4770 or GeForce4 410 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.