Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs ATI Radeon HD 4700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated769
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.70
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameRV730Broadwell GT3e
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 February 2010 (16 years ago)5 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors514 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2038.40
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs86
TMUs3248
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length193 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 February 2010 5 September 2014
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 293% more advanced lithography process, and 233% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4700 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 39 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4700 or Iris Pro Graphics P6300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.