GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh vs ATI Radeon HD 4670
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1198 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.19 | no data |
| Architecture | TeraScale (2005−2013) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | RV730 | TU106B |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 10 September 2008 (18 years ago) | 16 June 2020 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1125 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 514 million | 10,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 59 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 24.00 | 162.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.48 TFLOPS | 5.184 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 64 |
| TMUs | 32 | 144 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 288 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 36 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 193 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 10 September 2008 | 16 June 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 59 Watt | 115 Watt |
ATI HD 4670 has 95% lower power consumption.
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4670 and GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon HD 4670 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
