Xe DG1 vs ATI Radeon HD 4650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1280not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.97no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameRV730DG1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 September 2008 (17 years ago)2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320640
Core clock speed600 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors514 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2062.00
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS1.984 TFLOPS
ROPs820
TMUs3240
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length193 mm164 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 30 Watt

Xe DG1 has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4650 and Xe DG1. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 262 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 34 votes

Rate Xe DG1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4650 or Xe DG1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.