Rubin Ultra GPU vs ATI Radeon HD 4650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1281not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.97no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameRV730GR110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 September 2008 (17 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32057344
Core clock speed600 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2267 MHz
Number of transistors514 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate19.204,062.5
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs321792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cache64 KB112 MB
L2 Cache128 KB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 6.0 x16
Length193 mmno data
Width1-slotSXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1024 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)N/A
Shader Model4.1N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 3600 Watt

ATI HD 4650 has 7400% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 409500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1733% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4650 and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon HD 4650 is a desktop graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 262 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4650 or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.