Iris Plus Graphics 930 vs ATI Radeon HD 4650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1280not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.97no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRV730Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 September 2008 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320256
Core clock speed600 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors514 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2016.00
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.512 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs3216
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Length193 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics 930 has a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon HD 4650 and Iris Plus Graphics 930. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 262 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon HD 4650 or Iris Plus Graphics 930, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.